Structure
The engagement is built in clear stages.
Each stage is designed to give the firm more clarity before the next investment decision. The goal is to understand the workflow, size the opportunity, and configure AGENT425 only where support makes sense.
Diagnostic First
The firm starts with a structured estimate before deciding whether deeper review is useful.
Workflow Review
Agents425 studies the firm’s actual intake, billing, communication, and matter movement.
Configured Build
AGENT425 is built around the firm’s tools, roles, approval points, and support needs.
Revenue Diagnostic
Start with a structured estimate of workflow friction.
The Revenue Diagnostic gives the firm a fast view of where intake delay, administrative drag, follow-up gaps, and workflow inconsistency may be reducing revenue and capacity.
Forensic Review
The deeper review validates where support should be configured.
Our methodology uses a 15-variable model and benchmark-informed operating targets, including reference points drawn from Clio Legal Trends and ABA reporting, to determine how AGENT425 should be configured for the firm.
Build and Configuration
AGENT425 is configured around the firm’s operating conditions.
The build phase translates the workflow review into a configured system of specialized software agents, workflow rules, support paths, and review points.
What This Is Not
This is not a generic software rollout.
The engagement is not a prompt pack, a chatbot install, or a broad automation promise. It is a structured workflow improvement engagement tied to the firm’s actual process.
Commercial Structure
Commercial terms are staged around diagnostic clarity and build scope.
The longer engagement only makes sense when the diagnostic and workflow review identify a practical path to improving revenue and capacity.
Revenue Diagnostic: Complimentary
Forensic Review: Starting at $15,000
AGENT425 Build: Starting at $15,000
Retained Support: Starting at $3,500/month
Final scope and investment depend on workflow complexity, system environment, and the level of implementation support the firm needs.
Why Firms Choose This Path
The process gives partners control before commitment grows.
Firms choose this path when they want a practical workflow review, a measured build scope, and a system configured around real operating needs.
Clear Starting Point
The engagement begins with a practical diagnostic instead of an open ended software conversation.
Operating Fit
The work is shaped around the firm’s existing tools, team, and execution habits.
Measured Scope
The build is sized around workflow complexity and the level of support the firm actually needs.
Next Step
Start with the Revenue Diagnostic.
Use the diagnostic to frame the first conversation around your firm’s real workflow.